Today 21st March .
The National Press Club ran a very inadequate panel discussion on a subject that deserves more of the same. Rural poverty and the real risks of food production substitution . However the silly distraction that CC forced on the discussion meant that KEY political will questions were missed . "The problem of exploitation of rural sector did not arise because of climate change.
Our leaders waste our time and taxes getting distracted from real drivers ."
The agricultural experts on the panel seemed have no idea that these well intentioned discussions have been going on for eons , and do nothing to solve the bigger picture issues BECAUSE they are doing the same thing as those before -- they accept the nonsense that productivity is the problem . Do your homework guys or go home !( esop thoise of you that want conservation to cut more deeply )
CC and CT credibility is at an all time low. Now the press must carry some of the blame . They broadcast just about anything that puts CC on the agenda . Key reporters like Duffy's last week on Cape Grim suggest that " both droughts and floods are the result of CC" . Even if the sciences and geol record would support him ( they don't) , he appears to many as if he is trying, like the greens, to have it both ways .
In Santayana's terms, these are the times , (when the argument is being shored up by doubled up efforts,) that the label of fanatical is to be expected .Certainly the air is filled with a sense of that being the case . Who then is being the most fanatical here ?
CC and carbon tax now don't even target the whole carbon economy focusing now largely on coal . " Clean energy future " talk should focus on petrol , diesel and gas and biofuels to be credible. The government is not credible on Carbon econmy and even the greens and independents seem unable to say so . The 1000's of pages to " make it work " beggars belief from even the least educated person in the country .
Interestingly the PM reckons that the opposition leaders is running a fear campaign .Fanatics love to use the fear tactic . Is the truth then closer to " takes one to know one "
Hidden within the deep flowing waters of economic life are some disaster risk elements that some just don't want to talk about. Greed dressed up as need , and effort and product wasted. The richer we are, the more prone we are to the myth that we can "buy everything" and pay for nothing. Individual economic strength can distort our view of the basic health and economic needs of communities. How should governments try to manage galloping consumption and distorted access to our shared resources?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment